Showing posts with label 20. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 20. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 7, 2015

Screenshot of the Week 20 Obsession !




                The last couple of weeks I haven’t been very productive in terms of gaming, barely played anything, but I did find the willpower to finish the latest Thief game. I will not write a review about it, it is already too late and the review won’t be very positive anyway, but I can express my opinion about the game in a few phrases in this article.
                Thief is one of the series I love with thrilling atmosphere, challenging difficulty and complex stealth play of the previous games were something hard to find in any newer games (Dishonored took a decent shot at it). The latest game did manage to recreate some of that atmosphere and for a while even the story was interesting enough to keep me going (actually the reason I came back to finish the game). But in the second half of the game the story was rushed and unpolished, at some point things didn’t tie up anymore and the presence of existence of some characters in relation with the story hardly made any sense.
                The gameplay gets repetitive and feels like a grind just after a few hours into the game. There are always the same safes to crack, the same locks to pick, the same type of traps or the same hidden areas. The game lacks uniqueness in its gameplay, I wanted to see puzzles, ingenious traps and protection systems like the old games had.
There is a lot to steal in the game but very little challenge in doing it, because it always relies on the same mechanics and after doing the same thing over and over again things become mechanically easy.
                The stealth play is fine, but with the addition of focus powers and a very helpful interface (but horrible to navigate) the game wasn’t a big challenge even on master difficulty.
                Besides the gameplay problems there are also some very questionable choices when it comes to the world design. The multitude of pointless loadings and the fragmentation of the world map are hardly bearable. Without an SSD I can’t imagine how frustrating it is to play this game and wait loading after loading (and these loadings are not short).
                Overall, Thief left me the impression of a game took from another era and forced into a new one. Developers tried hard to make it enjoyable for everybody and skipped on the details and complexity that made this series great. In the end, the game probably didn’t fully please anyone, as it doesn’t really excel at any of the elements used in it and is and I think it is overshadowed by Dishonored, something that should not happen.
It could have been something great and I wanted it to be so, I really did. Thief was one of the games I expected the most in 2014 and disappointed me deeply (not at the level of Watch Dogs disappointment). I’m not sure if the game will get a sequel and I don’t know if I would want one considering how things went with this game. I suppose I will have to wait for Dishonored 2 and see how that game turns out.
Garrett?!

                I can’t believe I actually managed to keep up with my schedule this week and posted the two articles about some of the upcoming games in 2015. I hope I can do the same in the next week, as I want to post two more articles, one about upcoming FPS games and one about upcoming strategy games. At the moment seems to be quite a herculean task, I had no idea there are so many strategy games planned for 2015, but hopefully I will manage to get it done in time.
                I’m also slowly working on reviews for Elite: Dangerous and This War of Mine. I will probably post them at the end of this month or the beginning of February.

In the meantime, please share my articles and follow me on Steam and on Twitter!!


Thanks!!!
Read more »

Game 20 Manhunter 1 Introduction


Its actually quite sad to see the twin towers in a game set in 2004.

Finally I’m ready to move on from Larry 2 to the 20th game on the list, Manhunter: New York. It’s yet another Sierra game that I’ve never played and one that has always intrigued me. In fact, a good friend of mine talked about how much he loved this game for years, encouraging me to play it. Unfortunately, that same friend recently cranked up DOSBox and played the game again, two decades after his original life-changing experience. He refuses to talk about it much, but it’s clear that his recent play through all but destroyed the wonderful memories he had from his childhood. In short…he wasn’t impressed. I however, have no Manhunter nostalgia to crush, so will go into this with fresh eyes and an open mind. Before I get underway, it’s worth looking at how the game came about and how it fits into the Sierra timeline.


The box artwork sets the dark tone that the title screen fails to do.

Manhunter: New York was created by a company called Evryware, which was made up of what I assume is three siblings. Barry, Dave and Dee Dee Murry developed the game for Sierra On-Line back in 1988. Barry seems to have been the leader of the gang, being involved in the design, programming, graphics and music (Dave had a hand in the design and programming while Dee Dee assisted with graphics). This wasn’t the family’s first attempt at making a game however, as Barry and Dave had already had a fair amount of success with their The Ancient Art of War games, which were published by Brøderbund. In fact, it was the quality of those games that caused Sierra to get in touch with them to see whether they wanted to create a game for them using the AGI engine that the company had already built an empire with. Jumping at the opportunity, the Murry brothers were not satisfied with simply taking the technology and running with it. Instead, they decided to make something far removed from the standard Quest games Sierra were known for.


The Murry family, dressed in the monk robes (hired from a local costume shop) that the Orbs force humanity to wear.

After many months of design, the Murry’s finally decided their game would have much more mature themes than the likes of King’s Quest and Space Quest. It would be set 16 years in the future (2004 to be precise) and would have dark and at times gory themes. It would use real life locations, and they even spent two days in New York photographing locations that would make an appearance in the game. They chose New York as the city because they felt it lent itself well to the gritty, bleak landscape they had in mind. The backstory goes that the Earth has been enslaved by aliens known as the Orbs (giant floating eyeballs). The Orbs have implanted tracking devices in all surviving humans to keep them under control and it’s a capital offence for any human to speak at any time. Certain humans are enlisted by The Orbs as “Manhunters”, with the role of tracking down fellow humans that make any attempt to form an underground resistance. The protagonist of the game is one such Manhunter!


An Orb: Apparently the Murrys made them look like this purely because it was easy to animate.

It’s definitely worth noting that Manhunter uses Sierra’s AGI engine rather than the SCI engine that both King’s Quest IV and Leisure Suit Larry 2 utilised in the same year. I can’t find anything concrete, but I assume Manhunter was developed and released prior to those two games in 1988, making me wish I’d played them in that order. Still, this doesn’t look like a standard AGI game as the Murry’s totally messed with the system to make it do what they wanted. The end result is a game with no text parser whatsoever, making it the first Sierra published game to have a complete point and click interface. This path was chosen mostly due to the fact that no characters in the game were allowed to speak, so a substitute form of control was created. Manhunter: New York also includes a “first person perspective, bizarre camera angles, picture-in-a-picture, long pans, extreme close-ups, overhead shots and a faux 3-D sequence”, making it a truly unique game in the Sierra adventure canon to date.


Blade Runner: An obvious inspiration for Manhunter.

The influence of Blade Runner on Manhunter: New York is obvious, but it’s interesting that the player is enlisted to track down humans rather than the “replicants” that Decker chases in that masterpiece. I’m looking forward to seeing how that plays out, but I have to admit that the screenshots do not look appealing from a visual point of view. I’ve downloaded a DOS version of the game and plan to run it in DOSBox and also got my hands on the manual and a map that came with the original packaging. The manual is called the Official Manhunter’s Field Guide (Planet Earth Edition) and it describes the alien invasion through journal entries written by the protagonist. It also has the notice that was sent to all those humans selected to be Manhunters, which describes the obligations of the chosen along with the devices that are used to fulfil them. It’s a nice touch and makes me eager to get going!


I miss the days of manuals like this one. They really do get you in the mood to play!

Note Regarding Spoilers and Companion Assist Points: Ive recently written a set of rules regarding spoilers and companion assist points. Please read it here before making any comments that could be considered a spoiler in any way. The short of it is that no points will be given for hints or spoilers given in advance of me requiring one. As this is an introduction post, its an opportunity for readers to bet 10 points (only if they already have them) that I wont be able to solve a puzzle unassisted (see below for an example). Its also your chance to predict what the final rating will be for the game. Multiple readers can predict the same score, but will be rewarded a decreasing amount of points if it turns out to be correct.

Example Bet:
Bet: V cerqvpg lbh jvyy trg fghpx va gur zhq. Zl vavgvnyf ner WJ naq V yvxr pbzvp obbxf. Jub nz V?
Read more »